Grice’s Maxims: “Do the Right Thing”

نویسنده

  • Robert E. Frederking
چکیده

Grice’s maxims are hopelessly vague, and in fact harmful, because they form a misleading taxonomy. While his cooperative principle may be useful at a high level of theoretical analysis, it too is vague, and should not be directly implemented in computational natural language systems. Answers are suggested to a number of this symposium’s topics based on this position. Examples are presented to show that the maxims are too vague and too general, and that they are not really used by computational systems that claim to be based on them. The historical origins of the maxims in Kant’s philosophy are revealed. A comparison is made with Relevance Theory, which seems to provide a better approach to the same phenomena. I conclude by suggesting that it may be too early in the history of computational linguistics to expect to find such broad

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Evaluating Dialogs based on Grice’s Maxims

There is no agreed upon standard for the evaluation of conversational dialog systems, which are well-known to be hard to evaluate due to the difficulty in pinning down metrics that will correspond to human judgements and the subjective nature of human judgment itself. We explored the possibility of using Grice’s Maxims to evaluate effective communication in conversation. We collected some syste...

متن کامل

The Role of the Gricean Maxims in the Generation of Referring Expressions

Grice’s maxims of conversation [Grice 1975] are framed as directives to be followed by a speaker of the language. This paper argues that, when considered from the point of view of natural language generation, such a characterisation is rather misleading, and that the desired behaviour falls out quite naturally if we view language generation as a goal-oriented process. We argue this position wit...

متن کامل

Relevance Implicatures

According to standard pragmatics, we should account for conversational implicatures in terms of Grice’s (1967) maxims of conversation. Neo-Griceans like Atlas & Levinson (1981) and Horn (1984) seek to reduce those maxims to the so-called Q and I-principles. In this paper I want to argue that (i) there are major problems for reducing Gricean pragmatics to these two principles, and (ii) in fact, ...

متن کامل

Conversational Implicatures and Communication Theory

According to standard pragmatics, we should account for conversational implicatures in terms of Grice’s (1975) maxims of conversation. NeoGriceans like Atlas & Levinson (1981) and Horn (1984) seek to reduce those maxims to the so-called Q and I-principles. In this paper I want to argue that (i) there are major problems for reducing Gricean pragmatics to these two principles, and (ii) that, in f...

متن کامل

Lexical alternatives improve 5-year-olds’ ability to compute scalar implicatures

The term scalar comes from the idea that linguistic terms like some and all form ordered sets of alternatives based on informational strength, typically described as scales. In our case, the term some can be thought of as belonging to the following scale < some, ..., most, all> (see Horn, 1972). An account of how scalar implicatures are derived was described by Paul Grice (1975). He suggested t...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1996